Menu Bar

Showing posts with label Community Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Community Development. Show all posts

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Novo Ecijano Youth gather to call for Clean, Honest, and Responsive Elections




The youth of the province pose with the tarpaulin covered with their signature of commitment for a clean, honest, and responsive elections.

Novo Ecijano youth gathered last May 12 at St. Nicholas de Tolentino Cathedral, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija to call for clean, honest, and responsive elections. Youth representatives from Rock the Vote, KABATAAN Partylist, College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP), National Union of Students of the Philippines (NUSP), I Against Child Trafficking (i-ACT) Movement, Students for the Advancement of Volunteerism and Excellence (SAVE-NE), Central Luzon State University Supreme Student Council (CLSU-USSC), You.ORG, and Parish Youth Council (PYC) of Cabanatuan all pledged their support for the campaign against fraud, violence, and indifference.

The youth leaders expressed their hope for the prospect of genuine social change through active participation in the elections, not just as voters, but as watchdogs, and their understanding of the role of the youth sector in nationbuilding. Dan Kevin Roque

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

I Will Never Stay Idle



Special Feature: Philippine Social Realities

 “Our hope is placed on you.  The world belongs to you.  The future belongs to you.” - Mao Tse Tsung


Moments when I viewed my grades online, when my heart sank into frustration, and a part of me burst of regret — flabbergasted by the numbers that appeared on the computer screen. A little dissatisfied, perhaps because I knew that wasn't tantamount to all of my laudable efforts on the academe.
A roster of Uno’s yet still lacks a .7 to reach the average of 1.25 to be qualified as a President’s Lister (though I am thankful now being a Dean’s Lister).
It took me an hour to move on from the regret; it took me countless text messages from my comrades to make me feel relieved. And while over-thinking of some people I knew who qualified for PL, I recalled my personal experiences with them inside the four walls of the classroom — my regrets vanished into oblivion.
I was like a kid on my first month of stay in my University, confident that this institution will prepare me for life, and even make me feel safe for the next 3 years to come.
then my first year of college opened my eyes to reality. The lessons were copied then pasted from the internet, the syllabi wholly imitated from other schools, the kind of system implemented a facsimile of, yet again, that from other schools, and some professors teaching inefficiently and imposing unethical rules, I formed a notion that it is, perhaps, the reason why several students are academically good yet politically ignorant.
Indeed. To graduate with flying colors is a passport to a more sustainable future. But what kind of future is to come if the present is already lambasted with fascist dictatorship, with semi-colonial and semi-feudal systems, if our present is repeatedly raped by abusive and imperialist nations, if the present has a cue of an unbearable future?  
Algebra, Science, English... aren't we forgetting the Society and its system? If Society (the out-of-the-box context of it) is just a subject to be learned and analyzed at school, I guess people will not anymore become ignorant: Indeed, they will finally fight for their rights; finally realize that they are being suppressed without knowing it at all.
I bet students will no longer be a mere Laude who is theoretically good yet unable to apply his/her knowledge into practice. If all are to study society and how our nation and the Filipino people are being maltreated and abused, perhaps people will demand for justice, and that these inhumane systems will be changed.
I will never ever forget this one teacher of mine, not for the low grade that he gave me, but for his alleged accusations that made me furious at him. I blurted profanities while thinking of defending my right as a student. I then said to him, “Sir, your action just clearly justifies that the education system is colonial, commercialized, and fascist. And that I refuse to embrace this kind of system.”
Some of my classmates thought that I was over reacting on a little issue. But if only they were aware of the neo-liberal policies that made the education system poor and dreadful — that made Kristel Tejada suffer and surrender — if only they knew how many underprivileged youths were desperate enough to try prostitution and other less-than moral choices just to go to school, if only they saw lots of parents painstakingly sweeping every corner of a capitalist’s office just to pay his/her child’s high tuition and other fees at school, I guess they would somehow understand my battle.
I guess they would no longer laugh at me when I’m discussing the society’s ill-fated situation, the political issues and how they are being affected by them. I hope they would no longer react sarcastically when I am tasked to report the peasant situation in the Philippines. I guess they would no longer be busy memorizing our lectures while the Union has a greater chance to conduct a strike. I guess, and hope, that they would embrace our day to day battle.
And I suppose my professor would somehow realize that all battles are related. And that we are all part of a one struggle.
Of the two semesters, I learned ‘some’ things. Though majority of it came from spoon-fed lessons and memorizing the word-for-word definition of a term that one can also simply defined in a simple, straightforward sentence, I learned more, and guess where? It’s with integrating with the peasants and laborers; it’s living in the unfortunate communities, it’s in socializing with the marginalized sectors; it is being with the MASSES and UNDERSTANDING them. It is being with them that I learned of the real-world difficulties and how we can solve them — It is with them that I learned the essence of applying THEORY into PRACTICE.
For whom do you study hard? For whom do you work? To live and toil solely for your OWN satisfaction is like not living a LIFE at all. A friend once told me, “Mas gugustuhin ko pang mamatay kaysa mabuhay ng walang nagawa para sa bayan.”
To quote my one professor, “Grades are just mere figures.” Numbers don’t define you. Numbers don't measure your precious experience.
I regret nothing now. I do not regret of not pursuing my summer job as a call center agent and setting aside the opportunity to earn money. For I have been working, not for myself, but for the majority and for a better world, without salary, and through my work I have earned many things more than the amount of a call center’s income could compensate.
We are often labeled as extremist, as rebels, as noisy unsatisfied radicals. But the state never affirms, never exhibits, that we are SERVING THE PEOPLE.
I am thankful being able to go to school. I am thankful to see the big picture. And one thing is for sure, I will never stay SILENT and IDLE. Never. Lester May Castillo

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Peasant Struggle in Nueva Ecija

Prepared by: Alyansa ng mga Magbubukid sa Gitnang Luson (AMGL, Peasant Alliance in Central Luzon) 



Land use classification of Nueva Ecija
Significance of the Province

Nueva Ecija is publicly known as the rice-granary of the Philippines.  Its vast agricultural lands are cultivated with rice that farmers consider their main source of livelihood.  Rice cultivation is also the culture of Nueva Ecija farmers.  The province’ 158,269-hectare rice lands ranked 2nd in the country, but irrigated lands of 119,459-hectares are the biggest among provinces.  It also ranked 2nd in production, harvesting about 560,379 metric tons or 7.29 million sacks of rice, but first in irrigated palay of 462,185 metric tons.  Its production compose 9% of the country’s total and 43% of the region’s total.  Irrigated lands compose about 75% of the its total rice lands, thus, it is very clear that agriculture is distinguishedly productive.  Rice farms yield about 80 to 100 cavans per hectare with some reaching to 120 cavans.  Plain lands in the province are more than half which are of high potential for agricultural production.


Essential to the province’ agricultural productivity, are the farmers who sturdily cultivate rice lands that compose about 28% of it total land area of 575,133-hectares. The province’ population compose 19% of the region ranking 3rd and its land area 27% being the biggest.  Nueva Ecija also composed majority of the farmer-beneficiaries of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).  Based on its 2010 accomplishment, 95,855 Nueva Ecija farmer-beneficiaries compose 36% of the region’s total tilling 169,375-hectares or 42% of the region’s total. 

Nueva Ecija is totally a significant province in the country, contributing majorly in the country’s total rice supply and it is also a model of the bankruptcy of CARP as the government’s claimed number of FBs is questionable as farmers are presently facing massive cancellations of Certificate of Land Ownership Awards (CLOA), Certificate of Land Transfer (CLT) and Emancipation Patents (EP).  Rice production is also threatened by the government’s program that would result vast land use conversion.  Nueva Ecija is a potential  ground for the struggle for genuine land reform and its farmers a powerful force of the peasant movement.





Thursday, February 7, 2013

E-Martial Law: a pool of contradiction, a threat to cyber freedom




The internet has become a medium of expression for the citizens and journalists of the new generation. After all, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) promotes online freedom of expression as a basic human right. But the creation of RA 10175 or Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 now poses a threat to freedom of speech, expression and of the press, a clear contradiction to Article III, Section 4 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.
A mere lip service
The Cybercrime Prevention Act was introduced in July 2011 and was signed in September 2012 while the overdue Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill, which has been certified by President Benigno Aquino III (PNoy) as a priority bill in January 2012, was introduced in 2008 and is still pending. One can easily compare the pace of the contradicting laws and one can easily tell the reason behind it.
The FOI bill is intended to aid in transparency which is a democratic right as well. Article III, Section 7 of our constitution recognizes our right “to information on matters of public concern”. After all, PNoy vowed for transparency during his campaign in 2010. He even made a commitment to press freedom during the World Press Freedom Day last May. Paradoxically, Malacañang’s support appears to be dwindling. They said they still have to review the bill for possible holes that may cause national security risk. This made us wonder if they made the same consideration of reviewing the questionable provisions of RA 10175 as well.
The government’s way of prioritizing bills appears to be a sort of cost-benefit analysis – the FOI bill will benefit the media and the public but will cost “security risk” while Cybercrime Prevention Act will benefit the politicians but will cost invasion of privacy to the netizens. If PNoy maintains that we – the citizens – are really his “boss”, then isn’t it just righteous of him to opt for the one which will be more beneficial to us?
Riddling loopholes
There are several ambiguous provisions that are yet to be addressed in the said law though PNoy already signed it last year. Among these are the issues discussed in the first oral arguments last January 15:
  • Cybersex, which is under content-related offenses, was defined in Section 4(c)(1) as “the willful engagement, maintenance, control, or operation, directly or indirectly, of any lascivious exhibition of sexual organs or sexual activity, with the aid of a computer system, for favor or consideration.” However, it failed to make a distinction between consensual and non-consensual acts and it was not clearly indicated who among the involved persons committing this offense will be penalized.
  • Online libel in Section 4(c)(4) was defined as “the unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, committed through a computer system or any other similar means which may be devised in the future.” This means, though it has the same elements as libel defined in RPC, committing it online could get you imprisoned for up to 12 years. The congress continues to ignore demands for the decriminalization of libel. We all know that the insertion of libel clause and making it a criminal offense will only serve as an instrument for the politicians to manipulate and harass the media.
  • Section 5(a), the provision that really puzzles the netizens, also constitutes “aiding or abetting to libelous contents” as an offense. The definition is so vague that even the lawmakers cannot explain or defend it consistently. How can a citizen be aware if he is already committing a crime? Does sharing, retweeting or liking libelous posts earns one a ticket to jail?
  • Section 6 of the said law states that “penalty to be imposed shall be one (1) degree higher than that provided for by the Revised Penal Code.” According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), it’s easier to commit these offenses since pretty much everyone has internet access nowadays. Still, it’s not enough of an explanation especially how they would distinguish libel from online libel.
  • Section 12 or the real-time collection of data allows the respective authorities “to collect or record by technical or electronic means traffic data in real-time associated with specified communications transmitted by means of a computer system.” It evidently violates our right to “the privacy of communication and correspondence” as indicated in Article III, Section 3 of our constitution.
  • The dubious takedown power of the DOJ which is stated in Section 19 means it no longer needs a court intervention to “restrict or block access to such computer data”. This, again, is a contradiction to Article III, Section 1 of our Constitution – “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.”
Refuse to be gagged
As an advocate of press freedom, the College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP) – Central Luzon supports the campaign against Cybercrime Prevention Act. CEGP Tarlac will conduct a forum to better inform the people about their basic rights to freedom and educate them about the hazards of the said law. The said forum will be held in Tarlac State University on January 31, 2013. We will also have a photo campaign called “Pose to Oppose” where people can express their disapproval with Cybercrime Law through photo opps.
As the temporary restraining order (TRO) expires on February 6, let us join the National Day of Protest to Junk Cybercrime Law. It’s time for PNoy to hear out his real “boss”. Monica del Puerto, CEGP-Central Luzon Chairperson

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

CEGP, Kabataan Partylist, other youth groups stay vigilant despite extension of TRO on Cybercrime Law


The indefinite extension of the temporary restraining order (TRO) on Cybercrime Law is a victory for freedom lovers, but people must remain vigilant because the law might still be implemented even after the extended order, said youth groups such as Kabataan Partylist and College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP).

“The extension of the TRO for an indefinite period is a victory for all netizens, students, professionals and freedom lovers. It is a victory for the people who protested against the law online and offline. This is a product of collective effort for freedom of expression,” said Pauline Gidget Estella, national president of CEGP, the widest and oldest alliance of student publications in the country.

“However, we must remain vigilant. This is only an extension, and there is still a possibility of implementation after the extended TRO. What we want is a ‘permanent restraining order.’ We demand that the law be junked,”said Estella.

“The indefinite extension to the TRO is not enough. The youth, netizens and the rest of the Filipino people should still continue to push the high court to declare this law as unconstitutional and repeal this repressive measure of the Aquino administration to silence the people from telling the truth about the government,” added Marc Lino Abila, CEGP National Deputy Secretary-General.

Early this morning, sectoral groups trooped in front of the Supreme Court as part of the National Day of Action on the day of the supposed expiration of the TRO.

“The sustained online and offline protest should serve as a reminder for the Supreme Court to decide in favor of freedom of expression. What else does the government need to realize that this is a badly crafted law and can suppress free speech? The Solicitor General could not even defend this law properly,” said Estella.

Kabataan Partylist and College Editors Guild of the Philippines will continue the concert-vigil tonight as planned at Liwasang Bonifacio starting 5:00 p.m. Groups will march from Plaza Salamanca to Supreme Court at 4:00 p.m. Monica del Puerto, CEGP-Central Luzon Chairperson


Saturday, September 29, 2012

A Chapel Corrupted



Being a pre-dominantly Catholic country, most schools in the Philippines dedicate areas for religious purposes, be it a chapel or a small grotto. AU-PHINMA is one of the many non-sectarian academes with this feature: the Holy Family Chapel was a project of the Pamantasan ng Araullo Faculty and Employees Association 1983-1984. However, the gymnasium is currently the preferred venue for the Holy Mass since it can accommodate more people. Celebrating the Eucharist in the chapel is now a rare occasion; it has become a mere structure just like the rest of its concrete neighbors.

Ultimately, it has completely lost its essence with the students’ lack of discipline and respect for the place. They eat, gossip, and even date inside a supposedly place for prayer and reflection. Food wrappers, paper cups, and dusty shoe prints left on the pews are evidence of manifest irresponsibility and disrespect. Is the idea of caring for our second home, our alma mater, not reiterated enough? Paying tuition fees does not give us the license to litter, vandalize, and destroy. It should instead give us a sense of responsible stewardship for whatever we are paying for. The chapel deserves this kind of respect, as much as the rest of the campus does.

The photo of a child praying inside our chapel recently posted on Facebook gained comments from tagged student leaders, professors, and alumni. They shared sentiments regarding its misuse, and they all hoped that Araullians will soon realize that it is more than a hang-out place where one can kill time. Some of them also stressed that being a Catholic is never a determining factor of how an Araullian should treat the chapel. The wall post sparked a more important issue and absolutely drove the point home: regardless of spiritual belief, the chapel should be given utmost respect because it is still a house of worship, just like any other house of worship of any other religion. The logic behind this is another no-brainer: a Muslim would not want his mosque scattered with trash, and a Buddhist would frown upon anyone who would act intimately inside his temple. Simply put, a person would not be happy if somebody else is disrespecting his church in any way. Sadly, the possibility of Catholic Araullians defiling their own church cannot be ignored.  In fact, it might be a greater possibility than non-Catholics doing the aforementioned activities in the chapel.

When asked what he was doing, the child in the photo said he was praying for his sick mother. He definitely knew what the chapel is for, and he is not an Araullian to begin with. While everyone else satiates hunger and boredom in the chapel, someone had enough sense to seek refuge and guidance from his Divine Being. This incident does not call for any major spiritual transformation on our part. This just reminds us to shed the devil-may-care attitude and start giving the respect we want to gain in the first place. Ma. Gladys Repollo

Friday, August 3, 2012

CMA and Presidential Scholars Go Green



College of Management and Accountancy (CMA) students, Presidential Scholars, and student journalists open up the doors to a greener future as they take part on Araullo University – PHINMA’s “The Green Project 2.0”. The said event was done in accordance with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources’ (DENR) National Greening Program (NGP) held at Sitio Alorma, Doña Josefa, Palayan City last July 28, 2012.

Led by Forester and Chief Protection Officer of CENRO-Cabanatuan, August V. Fariñas, the AU students, specifically, members of Junior Marketing Association, Junior Philippine Institute of Accountants – AU Chapter, Hospitality and Tourism Management Society, Junior Banker’s Club, Presidential Scholars, ViewPoint, and faculty participated on the tree growing initiative as part of the 430-hectare wide reforestation of the said location. On that day alone, a total of 500 Narra seedlings were planted on a hectare of land through the joint efforts of CMA and CON students, faculty, and CSDL staff.

Started last July 13, 2012, the project aims to plant 5000 trees across a ten-hectare area over a year. According to Darren J. Gonzales, Student Welfare and Community Involvement (SWCI) Unit Coordinator, the Green Project is an advocacy of the University not only to raise environmental awareness but also to encourage Araullians to actively join the crusade for a greener country. This project also supports the world-wide campaign against global warming and climate change. Jillian Vergara
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...